Wet - Import export

Forced draft cooling towers are specially designed to handle zinc sulphate solutions or highly corrosive liquids. They are equipped with distribution in highly resistant material.EFFECTIVE DESIGN COMBINING performance easy access for easy maintenance - sprayers are accessible without scaffolding and removable minimization of drift losses: 0,001% and lower. SUITABLE FOR HIGHLY CORROSIVE LIQUID WITH 200gl/ sulphuric acid, Presence of fluorine, Crystallization of gypsum

The cooling tower with plume abatement (also called hybrid or wet/dry) is an evaporative cooling tower combined with a dry heat exchanger, used to abate the cooling tower plume. This is the best available solution where local constraints are such that the presence of plume is not accepted in normal conditions (along motorways, airports, close to residential areas).Hamon has an unrivaled reference list in this field.Plume abatement can be offered with mechanical draft cooling tower (cells) as well as with fan assisted natural draft (circular hybrid).ADVANTAGES: no plume visibility. outstanding performance of an evaporative cooling tower. cost attractiveness. all types of heat exchange media. for cell CT :same flexibility as an induced draft cooling tower. all types of structure (wood – frp – concrete – steel)

The induced draft cooling tower generally offers the most effective and economical solution to most of cooling needs. Hamon has supplied numerous IDCT worldwide for all power and industry applications and all environmental conditions. The IDCT offers the following advantages:flexibility. cost effectiveness. air flow almost constant regardless ambient air temperature. adapted to any water flow .flexible operation by shutting some cells. adapted to high thermal performance .all types of structure – wood, FRP, concrete, steel. all types of heat exchange surfaces from splash grids to high performance film

Plume-abated fan assisted natural draft or circular hybrid cooling tower is the best technical solution for large heat loads and stringent plume abatement requirements.Seawater application. If overall height is limited. To keep countryside free from visible plume formations and shadow .For locations close to residential areas .To facilitate permission processes. ADVANTAGES VS CELL TYPE HYBRID COOLING TOWER: Compact arrangement/space saving. No recirculation and interference effects. No wash down (grounding) effects of plume. Use of natural draft. No corrosion due to humidity and salinity in the neighborhood. Visually an interesting architectural structure.

The fan assisted natural draft cooling tower (FAND) combines the advantages of the natural draft cooling tower and the mechanical draft cooling tower.It becomes the best available technology when :Locations with limited plot plan. Overall height is limited. Important heat load . ADVANTAGES VS. CELLS: Compact arrangement. Power saving due to natural draft. No recirculation. Always a good alignment considering wind directions. Cooling by natural draft in case of electricity shortage.ADVANTAGES VS. NATURAL DRAFT CT: Reduced height. Better cooling characteristics during the summer season. Higher flexibility

ExxonMobil’s Wet Gas Scrubbing (WGS) technology allows refiners to reliably meet tough FCC emission regulations with well-proven technology.In 2002 and 2003, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company (EMRE) and Hamon Research-Cottrell (HR-C), entered into licensing and sublicensing agreements to provide ExxonMobil’s Wet Gas Scrubbing technology to sublicensees of HR-C.Expect these advantages:Can avoid costly CO boiler upgrades with allowable scrubber pressure drops as low as zero inches of water, Takes advantage of HRC’s almost 100 years of experience and global leadership position in providing air pollution control equipment to a wide range of industries, including refineries.Maximizes cat cracker availability - scrubber run lengths match longest FCC up-time in the industry, Meets or exceeds toughest particulate and SOx emission regulations, Produces environmentally benign wastewater safe for direct discharge, Collected catalyst suitable for direct low cost disposal

Dr. Frederick Cottrell developed the first wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) in 1907 to control sulfuric acid mist from a copper smelting process in Pinole, California.Since that time WESP technology has become well-established in both industrial and utility applications around the world to remove sub-micron particulate, condensables, and acid mist as a final polishing device in an air pollution control system where an upstream dry ESP, fabric filter or wet scrubber cannot capture the sub-micron particulate due to its small size.

Feature: Desulphurisation efficiency above 99% can be achieved, No handling of solids, Availability of above 98% can be achieved, Not much space required, No need for large amount of machinery ,Low investment and operating costs, Unlimited part load operation

Features: Desulphurisation efficiency above 99% can be achieved, Availability of over 98% can be achieved, Engineering not dependent on any specific location, Marketable product, Unlimited part load operation, Method with largest number of references in the world